a grade analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence for the primary outcomes in the sham controlled trials was moderate due to sparse data. the risk of bias in the other studies that did not use a sham control was high due to lack of blinding or inadequate methods used for randomization and allocation concealment or both. none of these rcts found acupuncture to be better than sham acupuncture for either of these two outcomes, and pooling the results of these rcts also did not show acupuncture to be better than sham acupuncture. we have therefore updated our previous cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of acupuncture for ibs (lim 2006) to assess whether the pooled effects of currently available trials show any benefit of acupuncture for improving symptoms or health-related quality of life in patients with ibs. because our objective was to evaluate the effects of tcm acupuncture compared to a sham treatment, no treatment or a western medicine control, we excluded rcts in which one form of acupuncture was compared with another form of acupuncture or a different type of tcm(e.g. in randomized crossover trials, only outcomes from the first period were eligible for inclusion, due to the risk of carry-over effects. we assigned the “yes” score to sham-controlled trials that either 1) evaluated the credibility of the sham and found the sham to be indistinguishable from true acupuncture or 2) used a penetrating needle or a previously validated sham needle (i.e. there is no universally agreed-upon instrument to measure outcomes in trials of ibs treatment, however overall ibs symptom severity is a key outcome in the majority of ibs trials and health-related quality of life is an important secondary outcome that may legitimately be considered as a primary outcome measure (irvine 2006). data from individual trials were combined when the trials were sufficiently similar in terms of control interventions (sham (placebo) acupuncture, no treatment, another active treatment, or acupuncture as adjuvant to another treatment), outcome measures (overall ibs symptom severity, ibs-related quality of life), and timing of outcome assessment (short-term, long-term). for the acupuncture versus sham comparison, data for the symptom severity outcome were presented in some studies as dichotomous data (e.g. also, in the trial report there was no description of whether or not the patients were required to have never previously used acupuncture, and there were no reported tests for checking the success of the blinding.
all trials included in this review were judged adequate on “choice of acupoints” and “needling technique”, except for the lowe 2000 trial, for which the acupuncture points and needling technique were not reported. fifty-five per cent of patients in the acupuncture group had adequate symptom relief compared to 49%of patients in the sham acupuncture group. eighty-four per cent of acupuncture patients reported improvement in symptom severity compared to 63%of patients in the pharmacological treatment group. none of these sham-controlled rcts found a statistically significant benefit of acupuncture relative to sham acupuncture for the outcomes symptom severity or quality of life. a larger improvement in symptoms due to an inert treatment, or an inert component of a treatment) in the acupuncture group than in the drug treatment group. although the acupuncture assessors judged the treatment frequency of the sham-controlled trials to be largely adequate, the chinese language comparative effectiveness trials used a much greater treatment frequency, with daily acupuncture treatments used in 9 out of 11 of these comparative effectiveness trials, and in all five of these trials that compared acupuncture to drug treatment. this indicates that further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate. in contrast, there was a lower overall risk of bias in the four comparative effectiveness trials that found acupuncture to be more effective than two antispasmodic pharmacological therapies shown to be effective for ibs (jailwala 2000; ruepert 2011) (i.e. patient preferences and expectations may partly explain the positive findings of these trials comparing acupuncture to drug treatment. to produce results generalizable to the average population of ibs patients, investigators of future pragmatic trials might minimize the recruitment of participants with an a priori preference for acupuncture by not specifying, in the recruitment of patients, that acupuncture is one of the treatment options being investigated. comparison 1 acupuncture versus sham acupuncture, outcome 5 quality of life (responders) (short-term:up to 3 mons, closest to 8 wks). comparison 6 acupuncture plus another traditional chinese medicine (tcm) treatment versus the other tcm treatment alone, outcome 2 quality of life (mean outcomes) (short-term: up to 3 mos, closest to 8 wks).
sujok therapy helps in healing various kinds of mental disorders like depression, phobia, anxiety, addiction, etc. sujok is known to be beneficial in alleviating symptoms of physical disorders or ill health conditions. sujok therapy also works as an absolute stress reliever, and helps in getting a good sound sleep. it also has a huge benefit in healing all types of injuries related to neck, feet, hands, joints, etc.
sujok therapy is a variation of acupressure or acupuncture that uses specific points in hands and feet to treat the ailments. not just this, it also helps in reducing back pain.round shaped seeds such as peas, and pepper are used to treat headaches, eye problems, and back and joint pain (along with knee pain). sujok therapy has a huge potential to control obesity. this therapy works on the energy concept of treating through the points on the palmand feet, with an objective of increasing blood circulation and letting in the vital energy flow, while reducing the extra lipids.
evidence from four chinese language comparative effectiveness trials showed acupuncture to be superior to two antispasmodic drugs (pinaverium acupressure points for irritable bowel syndrome | ibs treatment in #drrichavarshney #sujok #essentialoils #essentialoil acupressure irritable bowel syndrome natural treatment, .
irritable bowel syndrome treatment by sujok color therapy. best acupressure colour therapy books(exporter) is an modern alternative healing sujok is known to be beneficial in alleviating symptoms of physical disorders or ill health conditions. press or massage the key points in the through this therapy, one can diagnose any problem very easily. by pressing the key points and applying pressure in the right direction, one can also cure the, .
When you try to get related information on sujok therapy for ibs, you may look for related areas. .